<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think of Google Chrome OS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/</link>
	<description>Promoting open source software in our beautiful island</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-71</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. Whoever comes up with a cheap do-it-all device which runs on the cloud will win :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. Whoever comes up with a cheap do-it-all device which runs on the cloud will win <img src='http://lugm.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roshan</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Roshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Well I started reading fake Steve&#039;s article but gave up after point 2 as I thought he was just ranting rather than trying to be objective.

Google is not the only company at it... check these guys out - http://www.jolicloud.com/

Google&#039;s plan is simple.  It just wants to get rid of Microsoft and the biggest blow to MS would be if there was a company out there that could give them a run for their money on the desktop side.  Admittedly, Apple has a better desktop OS but its not very affordable.

A netbook with Google OS will cost around $60 less than one with Windows on.  If we use Jolicloud as an example of how applications can be installed very quickly and we don&#039;t have to pay for anti-virus, anti-spyware and anti-anything-else-you-want, then that could save you another $60.  I&#039;m sure that Google will optimise the OS to work very well with various Internet protocols to give the user a better experience as well.  Re-write the TCP stack like Sun did on their Open Solaris OS and improve performance of data throughput.

End result - you save $120 on a netbook by not having to pay for the OS and security software as well as another $100 for not buying MS Office.  You also end up with a machine that boots faster and performs better.  You have to remember that the average computer user doesn&#039;t know about free OS or free anti-virus software or open office, but if everything was on their netbook at the time of purchase, then they would use them as they are saving money.

Cloud computing has a few security issues at the moment but most of those should be resolved over the coming year or two.  Using the netbook offline and having data stored/accessible offline is also crucial.  Although downtime at Salesforce.com and Google Apps made headlines, I&#039;m sure that people have had equal amount of downtime rebooting their PCs when Excel or IE crashed on them.

Thanks,
Roshan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I started reading fake Steve&#8217;s article but gave up after point 2 as I thought he was just ranting rather than trying to be objective.</p>
<p>Google is not the only company at it&#8230; check these guys out &#8211; <a href="http://www.jolicloud.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jolicloud.com/</a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s plan is simple.  It just wants to get rid of Microsoft and the biggest blow to MS would be if there was a company out there that could give them a run for their money on the desktop side.  Admittedly, Apple has a better desktop OS but its not very affordable.</p>
<p>A netbook with Google OS will cost around $60 less than one with Windows on.  If we use Jolicloud as an example of how applications can be installed very quickly and we don&#8217;t have to pay for anti-virus, anti-spyware and anti-anything-else-you-want, then that could save you another $60.  I&#8217;m sure that Google will optimise the OS to work very well with various Internet protocols to give the user a better experience as well.  Re-write the TCP stack like Sun did on their Open Solaris OS and improve performance of data throughput.</p>
<p>End result &#8211; you save $120 on a netbook by not having to pay for the OS and security software as well as another $100 for not buying MS Office.  You also end up with a machine that boots faster and performs better.  You have to remember that the average computer user doesn&#8217;t know about free OS or free anti-virus software or open office, but if everything was on their netbook at the time of purchase, then they would use them as they are saving money.</p>
<p>Cloud computing has a few security issues at the moment but most of those should be resolved over the coming year or two.  Using the netbook offline and having data stored/accessible offline is also crucial.  Although downtime at Salesforce.com and Google Apps made headlines, I&#8217;m sure that people have had equal amount of downtime rebooting their PCs when Excel or IE crashed on them.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Roshan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasir</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Agreed!!!It&#039;s a pain to develop an OS which has only a browser as APP. It&#039;s expensive in terms of time and other resources. Having Chrome  OS on mobile devices(HTC/etc..) would have been interesting and worth the efforts (I think). Google will then be able to promote it&#039;s name and products on the world market..

Regards,
Yasir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed!!!It&#8217;s a pain to develop an OS which has only a browser as APP. It&#8217;s expensive in terms of time and other resources. Having Chrome  OS on mobile devices(HTC/etc..) would have been interesting and worth the efforts (I think). Google will then be able to promote it&#8217;s name and products on the world market..</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Yasir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Je suis d&#039;accord. Google Chrome OS (qui est du &lt;em&gt;vapourware&lt;/em&gt; pour l&#039;instant...) va forcer tout le monde à innover.

Ce qui est quand meme &lt;em&gt;cool&lt;/em&gt; est que la plupart des acteurs bougent vers Unix et/ou Linux (Android, Chrome OS, Palm Pre, iPhone, etc.) ce qui veut dire qu&#039;on a gagné :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Je suis d&#8217;accord. Google Chrome OS (qui est du <em>vapourware</em> pour l&#8217;instant&#8230;) va forcer tout le monde à innover.</p>
<p>Ce qui est quand meme <em>cool</em> est que la plupart des acteurs bougent vers Unix et/ou Linux (Android, Chrome OS, Palm Pre, iPhone, etc.) ce qui veut dire qu&#8217;on a gagné <img src='http://lugm.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominique</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Le but de google et de faire un terminal web qui va correspondre à 70% des besoins des utilisateurs. C&#039;est un excellent moyen de banaliser l&#039;usage de l&#039;informatique.

Linux quoi qu&#039;on en dise peut être extrêmement compliqué, si Googls OS simplifie à l&#039;usage unique d&#039;un browser comme j&#039;ai pu lire ... trop facile, même mon grand-père va s&#039;y mettre, de plus Google à déjà tout via web2.0, chat/mail/video/document/recherche/image/.... que demander de plus.

Aujourd&#039;hui tout le monde à un téléphone portable (comment a-t-on pu vivre avant), demain TOUT le monde aura un ordinateur, et si Google contrôle ... les publicitaires vont être de généreux contributeurs.

Ce n&#039;est pas une réel concurrence car le but final n&#039;est surement pas le même.

En tout cas, cela pousse les autres acteurs informatiques à innover encore plus. A tous les Geeks: sortez vos claviers !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Le but de google et de faire un terminal web qui va correspondre à 70% des besoins des utilisateurs. C&#8217;est un excellent moyen de banaliser l&#8217;usage de l&#8217;informatique.</p>
<p>Linux quoi qu&#8217;on en dise peut être extrêmement compliqué, si Googls OS simplifie à l&#8217;usage unique d&#8217;un browser comme j&#8217;ai pu lire &#8230; trop facile, même mon grand-père va s&#8217;y mettre, de plus Google à déjà tout via web2.0, chat/mail/video/document/recherche/image/&#8230;. que demander de plus.</p>
<p>Aujourd&#8217;hui tout le monde à un téléphone portable (comment a-t-on pu vivre avant), demain TOUT le monde aura un ordinateur, et si Google contrôle &#8230; les publicitaires vont être de généreux contributeurs.</p>
<p>Ce n&#8217;est pas une réel concurrence car le but final n&#8217;est surement pas le même.</p>
<p>En tout cas, cela pousse les autres acteurs informatiques à innover encore plus. A tous les Geeks: sortez vos claviers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux User Group of Mauritius » What do you think of Google Chrome OS? - mauritius news</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux User Group of Mauritius » What do you think of Google Chrome OS? - mauritius news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] Linux User Group of Mauritius » What do you think of Google Chrome OS? Is Your Ab Workout Hurting Your Back? - Mauritius Blog TrackerLinux User Group of Mauritius » [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linux User Group of Mauritius » What do you think of Google Chrome OS? Is Your Ab Workout Hurting Your Back? &#8211; Mauritius Blog TrackerLinux User Group of Mauritius » [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/07/09/what-do-you-think-of-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=216#comment-52</guid>
		<description>It is a good strategy ... MS is seriously considering to scrap Windows and develop Midori: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Life-After-Windows-Microsoft-Midori-Operating-System-88910.shtml ... cloud computing is the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good strategy &#8230; MS is seriously considering to scrap Windows and develop Midori: <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Life-After-Windows-Microsoft-Midori-Operating-System-88910.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Life-After-Windows-Microsoft-Midori-Operating-System-88910.shtml</a> &#8230; cloud computing is the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

