<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House goes Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lugm.org/2009/10/28/white-house-goes-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lugm.org/2009/10/28/white-house-goes-open-source/</link>
	<description>Promoting open source software in our beautiful island</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAR AUDIO GUY</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/10/28/white-house-goes-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>CAR AUDIO GUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=281#comment-981</guid>
		<description>Well it would be great to get open sources but the fact still remains if it would be a reliable information. Or falsified information that another part would make money out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it would be great to get open sources but the fact still remains if it would be a reliable information. Or falsified information that another part would make money out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/10/28/white-house-goes-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=281#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I suppose Obama&#039;s IT guys and girls evaluated a lot of solutions (including proprietary ones) before settling on Drupal. I guess they found that Drupal is secure enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose Obama&#8217;s IT guys and girls evaluated a lot of solutions (including proprietary ones) before settling on Drupal. I guess they found that Drupal is secure enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selven</title>
		<link>http://lugm.org/2009/10/28/white-house-goes-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Selven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lugm.org/?p=281#comment-188</guid>
		<description>It is a nice move, but i do have some doubts as to whether this should be drupal there... for i believe for whitehouse and stuffs where security is something needed... something much more custom should have been used.. don&#039;t get me wrong, i know that security through obfuscation doesn&#039;t work.. but i also do believe that drupal isn&#039;t mature enough and that they should have forked a version of drupal instead and heavily test it out for years before using it... ohh well.. that&#039;s just my opinion..

+selven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a nice move, but i do have some doubts as to whether this should be drupal there&#8230; for i believe for whitehouse and stuffs where security is something needed&#8230; something much more custom should have been used.. don&#8217;t get me wrong, i know that security through obfuscation doesn&#8217;t work.. but i also do believe that drupal isn&#8217;t mature enough and that they should have forked a version of drupal instead and heavily test it out for years before using it&#8230; ohh well.. that&#8217;s just my opinion..</p>
<p>+selven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

